The itinerary of claudication,
by Alberto Medina Méndez.
To generate changes need to be involved in policy says that phrase we've heard ad nauseum. Only since the party organizations can be influenced enough to change the course of reality. We've also read somewhere.
Many insist that to achieve the transformation, it is muddy, getting in the mud. The idea of \u200b\u200b"dirty" appears as the ideal it generates an environment enabling justificatory inadmissible certain issues deemed as necessary, such as dues, as an indivisible part of the truth. That's the gimmick that turn many to admit to themselves, certain frivolities.
But you say, seem to want to suggest that involvement implies invariably given to game the system. Recite with fervent passion, that list of values \u200b\u200bwith which the company is fully identified, the level of principles that we all want in our leaders. However, when incorporated in the party leadership, leaving the rhetoric, to give way to pragmatism deified empty of content, that will allow them the chance to do whatever, but always receding, leaving the road much of the above recited .
allowed this mutation, because it still failed to understand that politics is discredited just as dire practices transmitted, so that means giving up the ideals, the apparent compromise against enforcement raised by this route in which the prebend, discretion, cronyism, corruption and privileges seem too common.
Some assume that the path to the desired construction should be based on permanent concessions, delivery of the principles and beliefs trample over railways. Must say that nothing good can come of this process are handled in one's convictions. Nothing positive will come of that scheme in which the currency becomes honesty, openness and transparency.
If the attempt to make improvements to society, the price is beyond certain thresholds of morality, to fall into corruption, hypocrisy and concealment of public affairs, will say that it is an amount too high, that no good person would have to pay. Accept this compromise so docile, it's just an excellent argument to validate part of what has often been criticized.
We are exhausted of this dynamic in which "honest" will denaturing over time, once they feel part of the system with the conveniences that proposes the scheme. The tour includes the original enthusiasm, that then gives way to the eternal frustration at the impossibility of reaching expectations.
is that exactly, "the system" is prepared to prevent attacks of the romantics, idealists and dreamers. Have antibodies that protect it from the honest no will, the warm without deep convictions and proposes that as a "toll" give these flags, to achieve any progress negligible.
If intended to achieve those changes that society wants, it will have to blind eye, let arbitrary, illegal silence, be functional to the structural corruption and other accessories essential to continue making the rounds and many more convincing that these rules are correct and this is what can be done and no more than this, because in that case, this is a way to rule.
Perverts have always developed a set of beliefs that feed this fable and are intended to make it believable. The unwary, the gullible, the naive that abound among the good citizens, accept these rules, without more, just to play that game.
Those
abuse the system creates a need for the rest of this "so" you can not change, that these are guidelines and must adhere to them. Favoritism, discretionary, embezzlement, hidden boxes, and huge payroll issues that any average citizen with ruthless abhor and criticize virulence was attenuated when the star guest becomes part of the team recruited.
They try to convince everyone that these codes are unchangeable, that the bureaucracy makes sense that the laws were made to hold the frame that supports their unprovable political financing and that the traps are an essential part of his daily. They also say that despite all the criticism, it is better to be inside than outside, changes are able to be part of the system and not being outside.
Interestingly as they get submitted to the dreamers. The break and intimidate, oppress and intimidate them to their knees. Manage down their will, break your spirit, bend them and make them surrender them to believe they are insignificant compared with the power of the fait accompli. It is part of the strategy and go if they can be convincing.
All his arguments, without exception, are extremely kind to themselves and highly tolerant of their abuses. That line of claims for exemption from giving explanations, justify, keep them as secondary characters only abide by unwritten rules, which are not its mastermind.
Let everyone enter through that alternative is what they want. There will be recalled that the world is only changed when the pioneers took the initiative, those who dared to say "may" to challenge the obvious, not meekly accept the endless list of reasons that show because it "can not."
so peacefully We can not accept something that only entering the parties adjust to this. Is a half truth and as such, it is worth questioning. Definitely NOT change the system from within, at least not respecting its rules. Is modified from outside by setting the agenda. The alternative, more daring by the way, enter the system and be part of it, but to spray, without ceremony, its rules one by one.
is good to remember the proverb that says that only dead fish swim with the current. To guard against such fallacies perversely installed. Have become the biggest trap to co-opt the most gullible and make the journey of capitulation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment